Items
No. |
Item |
20. |
Confirmation of Minutes - 11 August 2021 PDF 173 KB
Minutes:
RESOLVED that the minutes of
the meeting held on 11 August 2021 be confirmed.
|
21. |
Declarations of Interest
Please note that, in accordance with the Members' Code of
Conduct, when declaring interests members must disclose the
existence and nature of the interest, and whether it is a
disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI) or personal and/or
pecuniary.
Minutes:
Councillor Biff Bean declared
a Personal and Pecuniary Interest with regard to the agenda item
titled 'Tritton Road, Lincoln'.
Reason: He lived very close to
the proposed siting of the monopole, the subject of the matter to
be decided.
He left the room during the
consideration of this item and took no part in the discussion and
vote on the matter to be determined.
Councillor Pat Vaughan
declared a Personal and Pecuniary Interest with regard to the
agenda item titled 'Tritton Road, Lincoln'.
Reason: He lived very close to
the proposed siting of the monopole, the subject of the matter to
be decided.
He left the room during the
consideration of this item and took no part in the discussion and
vote on the matter to be determined.
|
22. |
Update Sheet
Additional documents:
Minutes:
An update sheet was tabled at the
meeting, which included an additional objection received in
relation to Minute Number 6(a) – 192 West Parade,
Lincoln.
|
23. |
Work to Trees in City Council Ownership PDF 307 KB
Minutes:
Dave Walker, Arboricultural
Officer:
a.
advised the Committee of the reasons for the proposed works to
trees in the City Council's ownership and sought consent to
progress the works identified, as detailed at Appendix A of his
report
b.
highlighted that the list did not represent all the work undertaken
to Council trees, it represented all the instances where a tree was
either identified for removal, or where a tree enjoyed some element
of protection under planning legislation, and thus formal consent
was required
c.
explained that ward councillors had been notified of the proposed
works.
RESOLVED that the tree works set out
in the schedules appended to the report be approved.
|
24. |
Confirmation of Tree Preservation Order No163 PDF 188 KB
Minutes:
The Assistant Director for Planning:
- advised members of the
reasons why a temporary tree preservation order made by the
Assistant Director for Planning under delegated powers should be
confirmed at the following site:
- Tree Preservation Order 163:
1no Horse Chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) tree on the
southern boundary of 51 Meadowlake Crescent, Lincoln, LN6 0HZ,
adjacent to 53 Meadowlake Crescent, Lincoln, LN60HZ
- provided details of the
individual tree to be covered by the order and the contribution it
made to the area
- reported that the initial 6 months
of protection would come to an end for the Tree Preservation Order
on 10 November 2021
- confirmed that the reason for
making a Tree Preservation Order on this site was at the request of
the Arboricultural Officer, who was made aware of an intention to
remove this tree and carried out a site visit to assess the tree
for a Tree Preservation Order on this basis
- added that the Arboricultural
identified the tree to be suitable for protection under a Tree
Preservation Order; it had a high amenity value, and its removal
would have a significant effect on the aesthetic appearance of the
area
- advised that following
an extended 51-day period of consultation, there had been an
objection received to the order from the occupants of 53 Meadowlake
Crescent, as detailed within the officer’s report citing
concerns over:
- The size of the tree and
particularly the proximity to their conservatory roof
- Leaves that fell from the
tree regularly blocked the guttering which resulted in damp on the
internal conservatory walls, they also fell to the adjacent path,
making it slippery and a potential hazard
- Conkers that regularly fell
onto both the conservatory roof and the adjacent path, causing
concern of potential damage to both property and person
- added that an
objection had also been received from the occupants of 51
Meadowlake Crescent, where the tree was located, having raised
concerns that the tree was extremely large, close to the bungalow,
with some low hanging branches and potential for damage should they
fall
- reported that following the
review of the objections by the Arboricultural Officer it was felt
that the concerns raised could be dealt with by remedial works to
the tree; that most of the points raised were part of the natural
lifecycle of a tree and that the large size of the tree and the
amenity value that it added to the local area were the primary
incentives to placing this Tree Preservation Order, which would
ensure both the trees retention and correct management in the
future
- advised that confirmation of the
tree preservation order here would ensure that the tree could not
be removed or worked on without the express permission of the
council which would be considered detrimental to visual amenity and
as such the protection of the tree would contribute to one of the
Councils priorities of enhancing our remarkable place.
Members commented/questioned the
Arboricultural Officer as follows:
·
: Was it possible to take action to address ...
view the full minutes text for item 24.
|
25. |
Change to Order of Business
Minutes:
RESOLVED that the order of business
be amended to allow the report at 6 (c) of the agenda entitled
‘Tritton Rad, Lincoln’ to be considered as the last
agenda item.
|
26. |
Applications for Development
|
27. |
192 West Parade, Lincoln PDF 123 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Assistant Director for
Planning:
- advised that permission was
sought for demolition of an existing garage to accommodate a
one-bedroom property with one off road parking space, comprising a
double bedroom, bathroom, and open plan kitchen/living
area
- described 192 West Parade, a
large House in Multiple Occupation (HIMO) situated on the corner of
West Parade with Hampton Street, the proposed dwelling to be
located to the rear of 192, however, it would front onto Hampton
Street
- advised that the land in
between the rear of these properties and the site formed the
service yard to 116 High Street, including a single storey metal
clad store and some air conditioning units, to be accessed from
Gaunt Street between no’s 7 and 11 across the existing
service yard
- confirmed that the site was
situated within the West Parade and Brayford
Conservation Area
- referred to a previous
planning application for the site for demolition of the existing
garage to accommodate erection of two dwellings and creation of a
new vehicular access, withdrawn on 29 June 2021, due to officer
concerns regarding the proposed design of the scheme;
pre-application advice had since been sought on a scaled back
scheme which could be supported by officers
- provided details of the
policies pertaining to the application, as follows:
·
National Planning Policy Framework
·
Central Lincolnshire Local Plan LP26
- advised Planning Committee of
the main issues to be considered as part of the application to
assess the proposal with regards to:
·
Principle of Use
·
Visual Amenity
·
Impact on Neighbours
·
Technical Matters
- outlined the responses made
to the consultation exercise
- concluded that:
- The application proposed a
one-bedroom property in a plot between 192 West Parade and 1
Hampton Street.
- The proposal would not
increase the size of the existing HMO at 192 West Parade and would
be a modest residential unit for occupation by anyone other than
students.
- Its design was appropriate
given the surrounding context and it would result in no adverse
impacts on residential neighbours.
- It was therefore considered
to be in accordance with local planning policies LP25 and
26.
Helen Hancocks,
local resident, addressed Planning Committee in objection to the
application, making the following points:
·
She resided at 1 Hampton Street.
·
The proposed development would cause parking
issues.
·
There were 13 houses on Hampton Street with provision of a
maximum of 5 on-street car parking spaces, when people parked
sensibly.
·
The introduction of a dropped curb to facilitate the
development would result in 1 to 2 of these car parking spaces
being lost.
·
On-site parking at the current property would be
lost
·
The application site was situated at a blind spot for
drivers/pedestrians and was especially dangerous for local school
children during the school run.
·
There were already four houses numbered ‘No1’ on
Hampton Street, what number would this residence be
given?
·
The proposed development exerted pressures on existing
amenities.
·
192 West Parade was occupied by students as a HMO, the
development would result in loss of valuable garden space for them
to relax, get ...
view the full minutes text for item 27.
|
28. |
Todson House, Beaumont Fee, Lincoln PDF 125 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Assistant Director for
Planning:
- advised that permission was
sought for partial demolition of an existing building including
retention of its front façade and an extension to form 41
self-contained residential apartments with shared kitchen and
lounge facilities, adding 5 dormers to the roof of the
building
- described the location of the
site on the eastern side of Beaumont Fee, occupied by Todson House
with associated outbuildings to the rear, the Pathway Centre to the
south; a three-storey building providing accommodation and support
for homeless and vulnerable adults, and recently completed Iconic
Student Accommodation to the north consisting of a 3-5 storey
development and refurbishment of a former school
building
- reported that the current
application was submitted by Park Lane Group, the same applicant as
the previous development to the north, proposing student
accommodation also managed by Iconic
- confirmed that the site was
situated within the Cathedral and City Centre No.1 Conservation
Area
- added that the existing
building was not listed, although Friends Meeting House, a Grade II
listed building was situated on the opposite side of Beaumont
Fee
- advised that pre-application
discussions had taken place with the applicant/architect involving
other design options considered for the site including full
demolition, although a development which incorporated retention of
the front façade as the main entrance to the building was
considered to be the most appropriate
- provided details of the
history relevant to the site of the proposed development as
detailed within the officer’s report
- provided details of the
policies pertaining to the application, as follows:
- Policy
LP2 The Spatial Strategy and
Settlement Hierarchy
- Policy
LP6 Retail and Town Centres in
Central Lincolnshire
- Policy
LP7 A Sustainable Visitor
Economy
- Policy
LP13 Accessibility and
Transport
- Policy
LP25 The Historic Environment
- Policy
LP26 Design and Amenity
- Policy
LP29 Protecting Lincoln's Setting and
Character
- Policy
LP31 Lincoln's Economy
- Policy
LP33 Lincoln's City Centre Primary
Shopping Area and Central Mixed-Use Area
- National Planning Policy
Framework
- advised Planning Committee of
the main issues to be considered as part of the application to
assess the proposal with regards to:
- National and Local Planning
Policy- The Principle of the Proposed Mixed-Use
Development
·
Assessment of Harm to the Character and Appearance of the
Conservation Area
·
Residential Amenity
·
Archaeology
·
Highways and Drainage
·
Contamination
- outlined the responses made
to the consultation exercise
- concluded that:
- The development would relate
well to the site and surroundings, particularly in relation to
siting, height, scale, massing, and design.
- The proposals would bring a
vacant site back into use with the retention of the front
façade of the building, which would ensure the character and
appearance of the Conservation Area was preserved.
- Technical matters relating to
noise, highways, contamination, archaeology, and drainage were to
the satisfaction of the relevant consultees and could be dealt with
as necessary by condition.
- The proposals would therefore
be in accordance with the requirements of CLLP Policies and the
NPPF.
Planning
Committee discussed the content of the report in further
detail.
The
following comments and questions emerged from members:
·
This
planning application ...
view the full minutes text for item 28.
|
29. |
Land at Wolsey Way (between Larkspur Road and Windermere Road), Lincoln PDF 35 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Planning Team
Leader:
- advised that permission was
sought to vary the original wording of Condition 8 of 2016/0842/OUT
which stated:
No development shall be commenced until full engineering,
drainage, street lighting and constructional details of the streets
proposed for adoption have been submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall,
thereafter, be constructed in accordance with the approved details,
unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning
Authority.
Reason: In the interest of highway safety; to ensure a satisfactory
appearance to the highways infrastructure serving the development;
and to safeguard the visual amenities of the locality and users of
the highway.
b.
reported that it was proposed to replace this wording
with:
No development
shall be commenced until full engineering, drainage, street
lighting and constructional details of the streets proposed for
adoption have been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority. The surface water drainage designs are to
be in accordance with the revised Flood Risk Assessment dated 07
May 2021 by Eastwood and Partners. The development shall,
thereafter, be constructed in accordance with the approved details,
unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning
Authority.
Reason: In
the interest of highway safety; to ensure a satisfactory appearance
to the highways infrastructure serving the development; and to
safeguard the visual amenities of the locality and users of the
highway.
- advised that the change was
sought to reflect changes made to the drainage strategy following
further consultation with Anglian Water Authority
- described the location of the
application site to the West of Wolsey Way, adjoining the King
George V Playing Field to the west, residential development at
Westholm Close, Hurtswood Close and Wolsey Way to the north and
Larkspur Road to the south
- stated that the site was
granted outline planning permission in 2019 for 14 bungalows with
only the access fixed for the development, all other details
including layout, landscaping and size of the bungalows being
indicative at this stage; along with the appearance of the
dwellings these matters would be agreed through subsequent
application(s) for Reserved Matters
- provided details of the
policy pertaining to the application, as follows:
- National Planning Policy
Framework
- advised Planning Committee of
the main issue to be considered as part of the application to
assess whether the proposed wording of Condition 8 was
acceptable
- outlined the responses made
to the consultation exercise
- concluded that the proposed
Drainage Strategy was acceptable, and that the rewording of
Condition 8 was acceptable to reflect the detail contained
within.
RESOLVED
that the application to vary the wording of Condition 8
of 2016/0842/OUT be
granted subject to the signing of the S106 Deed of Variation
Agreement.
|
30. |
43 Queen Street, Lincoln PDF 33 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Assistant Director for
Planning:
- advised that permission was
sought for a two-storey side and rear extension to 43 Queen Street
to provide a garage and living area to the ground floor with two
bedrooms and a bathroom created to the first floor
- described the location of the
property to the north of Queen Street, off High Street, Lincoln,
attached to a two-storey property to the west, encompassing an open
space with a three-storey property beyond to the east
- referred to the previous
planning history to the application site as detailed within the
officer’s report
- provided details of the
policies pertaining to the application as follows:
- Policy
LP26 Design and Amenity
- Central Lincolnshire Local
Plan Policy
- advised Planning Committee of
the main issues to be considered as part of the application to
assess the proposal with regards to:
- Principle of the
Development
·
Visual Amenity and Design
·
Impact on Neighbours
·
Technical Matters
- outlined the responses made
to the consultation exercise
- gave clarification to the
issues regarding land ownership/rights of access in relation to the
rear of 45 Queen Street which were not matters within the remit of
Planning Committee; these were private issues to be resolved
between the parties involved through their own solicitors if
necessary
- referred to the Update Sheet tabled
at the meeting which contained a further representation in relation
to the proposed development, received too late for the deadline to
register to speak
- concluded that the proposed
extension would have no adverse impact on neighbouring residents
and would be appropriately designed taking into account the
surrounding area and it was therefore considered that the proposal
accorded with policy LP26 of the Local Plan.
Planning
Committee discussed the content of the report in further
detail.
Some
members of Planning Committee considered that the application for
development should be deferred until matters relating to boundary
issues had been resolved. Other members took on board
officers’ advice that the proposed development was
acceptable, and that ownership of land was not a matter to be
determined here.
The
following comments and questions emerged from members:
·
The
officer’s recommendation to locate the existing extension
further back into the body of the garden was acceptable as it would
have less impact on residential amenity.
·
The
addition of a window rather than a garage door was of a much better
design.
The
Assistant Director of Planning advised that the matter of land
ownership was not a material planning consideration and would not
be the subject of any potential breach of planning control. This
was a civil matter between both the applicant and the owner of the
adjacent land.
RESOLVED
that the application for planning permission be granted
subject to the
following condition:
·
Development to be carried out in accordance with the
plans
|
31. |
Tritton Road, Lincoln PDF 97 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
(Councillors
Bean and Vaughan left the room for this final item having declared
a personal and pecuniary interest in the matter to be considered.
They took no part in the discussion and vote on the matter to be
determined.)
The Planning Team
Leader:
- advised that determination
was sought as to whether prior approval was required for the
installation of a 20m Phase 8 monopole, C/W wrapround cabinet at
the base and associated ancillary works on Tritton Road,
Lincoln
- described the location of the
proposed site on the west side of Tritton Road, to the south of the
junction with Doddington Road,
- reported that the site sat
within the grass verge, between the footpath/cycleway and the road,
positioned to the south of an existing traffic light column on land
forming part of the adopted highway, the boundary with 127
Doddington Road, a two-storey property, and a bungalow at 35
Wetherby Crescent was located to the west with the wider area
characterised by further bungalows and two-storey
properties
- advised that the application
was submitted under Part 16 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
(GPDO) as amended by the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) (England) (Amendment) (no.2) Order
2016
- reported that paragraph A.1
(1) (c) (ii) of the GDPO set out permitted development rights to
install masts of up to 20m above ground level on land on a highway;
as the proposed monopole would be 20m in height and the
ground-based apparatus would not exceed 15m in height, prior
approval was only required for the monopole in terms of its siting
and appearance
- stated that a declaration had
been submitted with the application which confirmed that the
equipment was in line with International Commission on
Non-Ironizing Radiation Protection Public Exposure Guidelines
(ICNIRP)
- provided details of the
policies pertaining to the application, as follows:
- Policy
LP26 Design and Amenity
- National Planning Policy
Framework
- advised Planning Committee in
determining this prior approval application, that the Local
Planning Authority could only consider the siting and appearance of
the proposed telecommunications equipment
- outlined the responses made
to the consultation exercise
- concluded that:
- The siting and appearance of
the proposed monopole would have a harmful visual impact on the
character and appearance of the area by reason of its height, size,
design, and position, which was exacerbated by the site’s
highly visible location.
- It would appear as an
obtrusive, prominent, dominant, and imposing addition in the street
scene, contrary to Central Lincolnshire Local Plan Policy LP26 and
paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy
Framework.
Planning
Committee discussed the content of the report in further
detail.
The
following comments emerged from Members:
·
It
was noted that the purpose of the proposed monopole was to increase
a telecommunication network strength from 4G to 5G.
·
If
this site was not considered a suitable location, then where would
be, as there were already numerous other masts across the
city?
·
Concerns
were raised in the unfortunate event that a vehicle was
...
view the full minutes text for item 31.
|