Items
No. |
Item |
50. |
Confirmation of Minutes - 3 November 2021 PDF 166 KB
Minutes:
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 3 November 2021
be confirmed.
|
51. |
Declarations of Interest
Please note that, in accordance
with the Members' Code of Conduct, when declaring interests members
must disclose the existence and nature of the interest, and whether
it is a disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI) or personal and/or
pecuniary.
Minutes:
No
declarations of interest were received.
|
52. |
Update Sheet
Additional documents:
Minutes:
An update sheet was
tabled at the meeting, which included:
·
Additional comments received in relation to Agenda Item Number 5(a)
–Land Adjacent to Yarborough Leisure Centre, Riseholme Road,
Lincoln.
·
A response from Lincolnshire County Council as Highways Authority
stating that it had no objections to the development proposed at
Agenda Item Number 5 (b/c) – 40-42 Michaelgate, Lincoln
RESOLVED that the
Update Sheet be received by Planning Committee.
|
53. |
Work to Trees in City Council Ownership PDF 311 KB
Minutes:
Dave Walker,
Arboricultural Officer:
a.
advised the Committee of the reasons for proposed works to trees in
the City Council's ownership and sought consent to progress the
works identified, as detailed at Appendix A of his report
b.
clarified that although his schedule was dated 3 December 2021,
this was a typographical error; the schedule referred to works
planned as of 1 December 2021
c.
highlighted that the list did not represent all the work undertaken
to Council trees, it represented all the instances where a tree was
either identified for removal, or where a tree enjoyed some element
of protection under planning legislation, and thus formal consent
was required
d.
explained that ward councillors had been notified of the proposed
works.
RESOLVED that the
tree works set out in the schedules appended to the report be
approved.
|
54. |
Applications for Development
|
55. |
Land Adjacent To Yarborough Leisure Centre, Riseholme Road, Lincoln PDF 183 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Planning Team Leader:
- described the application for development on land in front of
Yarborough Leisure Centre, which proposed the erection of four 2/3
storey buildings fronting Riseholme Road to form townhouses with
five 3/4 storey buildings positioned behind
- reported that the development would consist of 293 bedrooms of
accommodation for students with ancillary on site reception,
laundry facilities and warden accommodation
- added that a new vehicular access would be formed to Riseholme
Road and 17 parking spaces provided within the site for accessible
unloading and staff parking only
- highlighted that the land in question was allocated as a site
for residential development in the adopted Local Plan, currently
owned by the City of Lincoln Council with an agreement to sell to
the applicants
- described the location of the development site currently
grassland on the west side of Riseholme Road, with Lincoln Castle
Academy and Yarborough Leisure Centre situated to the north and
west, residential dwellings fronting Riseholme Road and Yarborough
Crescent to the south, the old caretaker’s bungalow in
private ownership to the north, and a strong line of trees which
formed the boundary with Riseholme Road to the east
- referred to the site history to the application site; proposals
for 295 bedspaces together with teaching facilities, support space,
an on-site café and academic space, was refused by Planning
Committee on 26 February 2020 for the following reason:
“The application as proposed would be harmful
to the character and local distinctiveness of the site and its
surroundings by reason of the height and massing of the proposed
buildings contrary to the provisions of Policy LP26 of the Central
Lincolnshire Local Plan.”
g.
gave details of an amended scheme now submitted;
Bishop Grosseteste University had revised their brief and employed
a new design team, making key changes as detailed within the
officer’s report
- provided details of the policies pertaining to the application,
as follows:
- Policy LP1: A Presumption in Favour of Sustainable
Development
- Policy LP2: The Spatial Strategy and Settlement
Hierarchy
- Policy LP9: Health and Wellbeing
- Policy LP10: Meeting Accommodation Needs
- Policy LP12: Infrastructure to Support Growth
- Policy LP13: Accessibility and Transport
- Policy LP14: Managing Water Resources and Flood Risk
- Policy LP16: Development on Land affected by
Contamination
- Policy LP26: Design and Amenity
- Policy LP29: Protecting Lincoln's Setting and
Character
- Policy LP32: Lincoln's Universities and Colleges
- National Planning Policy Framework
- advised Planning Committee of the main issues to be considered
as part of the application to assess the proposal with regards
to:
- Principle of Use
- Visual Amenity
- Impact on Residential amenity
- Traffic and Pedestrian Safety
- Drainage/SUDs
- Trees and Landscaping
- Archaeology
- Contaminated Land
- outlined the responses made to the consultation
exercise
- referred to the Update Sheet tabled at the meeting which
included additional comments received in response to the
consultation exercise
- concluded that:
- The
previous refusal reason relating to height and massing of the
buildings had been overcome by the revised application.
- The
development would relate well to the site and surroundings,
particularly in relation to siting, height, scale, massing, and
...
view the full minutes text for item 55.
|
55a |
40 - 42 Michaelgate, Lincoln PDF 95 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Assistant Director of Planning:
- described the location of the application for development at
40-42 Michaelgate, a grade II listed building located on the east
side of Michaelgate, close to the junction with Steep Hill and
Bailgate
- added that it adjoined The Harlequin, 20-22 Steep Hill to the
east, also a grade II listed building, with a yard to the south of
the building beyond at 36 Michaelgate
- advised that the property was located within the Cathedral and
City Centre Conservation Area
- reported on observations made by the City Council’s
Conservation Officer as follows:
- The
building had historically been two distinct properties, as
suggested by the address, and by the various dates of
construction.
- No.
42, to the north, had been a house and shop dating from the mid and
late 18th century. Constructed from brick with a stone
plinth, at two storeys plus garrets, it included a late C18 glazing
bar shop window with pilasters and cornice.
- No.
40, to the south, was a domestic property and potentially dated
from the 14th century with 18th,
19th, and 20th century alterations. The
half-timbered structure sat on a dressed stone and brick ground
floor plinth. The gable framing had curved braces and corner posts
and the half-timber work was also expressed internally.
- added that there was currently access through a party wall that
linked the two buildings as a single unit and in recent years the
property had been a holiday let, managed by the National Trust,
vacant since 2018; the application proposed to reinstate the
historic use of the building as two distinct dwellings and it was
intended to continue the existing holiday let arrangement with the
two dwellings
- gave further detail of the proposed external and internal living
arrangements for the building as outlined within the
officer’s report
- confirmed that internal and external alterations were proposed
to facilitate the subdivision of the building, which also included
repair and enhancement works; whilst these works did not require
the benefit of planning permission, an accompanying application
(2021/0759/LBC) for listed building consent would consider these
with regard to the impact on the building as a designated heritage
asset
- highlighted that both the full planning permission and listed building
consent applications were being presented to Members of Planning
Committee for determination due to the application property being
in thew ownership of the City Council
- referred to the site history to the application site as detailed
further within the officer’s report
- provided details of the policies pertaining to the application,
as follows:
- Policy LP25: The Historic Environment
- Policy LP26: Design and Amenity
- Policy LP33: Lincoln's City Centre Primary Shopping Area and
Central Mixed-Use Area
- National Planning Policy Framework
- advised Planning Committee of the main issues to be considered
as part of the application to assess the proposal with regards
to:
- Policy Context and Principle of Use
- Visual Amenity and Character and Appearance of the Conservation
Area
- Residential Amenity
- Parking and Highways
- confirmed that consultations were carried out in ...
view the full minutes text for item 55a
|
56. |
40 - 42 Michaelgate, Lincoln (LBC) PDF 95 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Assistant Director of Planning:
- outlined an application submitted for Listed Building Consent at
40-42 Michaelgate Lincoln requesting:
- Internal and external alterations to facilitate subdivision of
an existing C3 dwelling (used as holiday let) to two C3 dwellings
(to be used as two holiday lets).
- Internal alterations including new partitions, re-pointing of
stone walls with lime mortar, replacement of brick wall with
reclaimed bricks, new limecrete floor, damp proof works, removal of
staircase and alterations to retained staircase.
- External alterations including re-roofing of a single storey
flat roof off-shoot and installation of conservation rooflight,
replacement timber windows, refurbishment of windows and dormer,
removal of render from the south east elevation to expose a timber
frame, replacement of concrete slabs with Yorkstone paving and
refurbishment of gates. (Listed Building Consent).
- described the location of the application for development at
40-42 Michaelgate, a grade II listed building located on the east
side of Michaelgate, close to the junction with Steep
Hill
- added that it adjoined The Harlequin, 20-22 Steep Hill to the
east, also a grade II listed building, with a yard to the south of
the building beyond at 36 Michaelgate
- advised that the property was located within the Cathedral and
City Centre Conservation Area
- reported on observations made by the City Council’s
Conservation Officer as follows:
- The
building had historically been two distinct properties, as
suggested by the address, and by the various dates of
construction.
- No.
42, to the north, had been a house and shop dating from the mid and
late 18th century. Constructed from brick with a stone
plinth it was two storeys plus garrets and included a late C18
glazing bar shop window with pilasters and cornice.
- No.
40, to the south, was a domestic property which potentially dated
from the 14th century with 18th,
19th, and 20th century alterations. The
half-timbered structure sat on a dressed stone and brick ground
floor plinth. The gable framing had curved braces and corner posts
and the half-timber work was also expressed internally.
- added that there was currently access through a party wall that
linked the two buildings as a single unit and in recent years the
property has been a holiday let, managed by the National Trust,
vacant since 2018; the application proposed to reinstate the
historic use of the building as two distinct dwellings and it was
intended to continue the existing holiday let arrangement with the
two dwellings
- gave further detail of the proposed external and internal living
arrangements for the building as outlined within the
officer’s report
- confirmed that this listed building consent would only consider the
proposed internal and external alterations with regard to the
impact on the building as a designated heritage asset; an
accompanying application (2021/0871/FUL) for full planning
permission would consider the principle of the use and matters
relating to visual amenity, the character and appearance of the
conservation area, residential amenity, and parking
- highlighted that both the full planning permission and listed building
consent ...
view the full minutes text for item 56.
|