The
Assistant Director of Planning:
- described the location of the application for development at
40-42 Michaelgate, a grade II listed building located on the east
side of Michaelgate, close to the junction with Steep Hill and
Bailgate
- added that it adjoined The Harlequin, 20-22 Steep Hill to the
east, also a grade II listed building, with a yard to the south of
the building beyond at 36 Michaelgate
- advised that the property was located within the Cathedral and
City Centre Conservation Area
- reported on observations made by the City Council’s
Conservation Officer as follows:
- The
building had historically been two distinct properties, as
suggested by the address, and by the various dates of
construction.
- No.
42, to the north, had been a house and shop dating from the mid and
late 18th century. Constructed from brick with a stone
plinth, at two storeys plus garrets, it included a late C18 glazing
bar shop window with pilasters and cornice.
- No.
40, to the south, was a domestic property and potentially dated
from the 14th century with 18th,
19th, and 20th century alterations. The
half-timbered structure sat on a dressed stone and brick ground
floor plinth. The gable framing had curved braces and corner posts
and the half-timber work was also expressed internally.
- added that there was currently access through a party wall that
linked the two buildings as a single unit and in recent years the
property had been a holiday let, managed by the National Trust,
vacant since 2018; the application proposed to reinstate the
historic use of the building as two distinct dwellings and it was
intended to continue the existing holiday let arrangement with the
two dwellings
- gave further detail of the proposed external and internal living
arrangements for the building as outlined within the
officer’s report
- confirmed that internal and external alterations were proposed
to facilitate the subdivision of the building, which also included
repair and enhancement works; whilst these works did not require
the benefit of planning permission, an accompanying application
(2021/0759/LBC) for listed building consent would consider these
with regard to the impact on the building as a designated heritage
asset
- highlighted that both the full planning permission and listed building
consent applications were being presented to Members of Planning
Committee for determination due to the application property being
in thew ownership of the City Council
- referred to the site history to the application site as detailed
further within the officer’s report
- provided details of the policies pertaining to the application,
as follows:
- Policy LP25: The Historic Environment
- Policy LP26: Design and Amenity
- Policy LP33: Lincoln's City Centre Primary Shopping Area and
Central Mixed-Use Area
- National Planning Policy Framework
- advised Planning Committee of the main issues to be considered
as part of the application to assess the proposal with regards
to:
- Policy Context and Principle of Use
- Visual Amenity and Character and Appearance of the Conservation
Area
- Residential Amenity
- Parking and Highways
- confirmed that consultations were carried out in accordance with
the Statement of Community Involvement, adopted January
2018
- highlighted at the time of writing this report
that the consultation period was still underway and to date no
statutory or public consultation responses had been received
relating to this full application; the consultation period would
have expired prior to the committee meeting and any comments
received would be provided within the update
sheet.
- noted, however, that the same consultations had been undertaken
for both the full and listed building consent applications;
therefore, the responses to the listed building consent application
that were relevant to this full application were referenced within
the associated report considered next at tonight’s
meeting
- referred to the Update Sheet tabled at the meeting which
included a response from Lincolnshire County Council as
Highways Authority stating that it had no objections to the
proposed development
- concluded that:
- The
sub-division of the property, re-instating its historic use, was
welcomed and would neither result in the area losing its mixed-use
character nor would it detract from the vitality or viability of
the primary shopping area.
- The
external works associated with the sub-division, although not
requiring planning permission, would be an improvement to the
building and would enhance the character and appearance of the
conservation area.
- The
application would not cause undue harm to the amenities of
neighbouring properties.
- The
application would therefore be in accordance with the requirements
of CLLP Policies LP25, LP26 and LP33 and guidance within the
NPPF.
The Committee considered the
content of the report in further detail.
RESOLVED that planning permission be grantedsubject to the conditions as set out below.
Conditions