The Assistant Director of
Planning:
- described the location of the
application for development at 40-42 Michaelgate, a grade II listed
building located on the east side of Michaelgate, close to the
junction with Steep Hill and Bailgate
- added that it adjoined The
Harlequin, 20-22 Steep Hill to the east, also a grade II listed
building, with a yard to the south of the building beyond at 36
Michaelgate
- advised that the property was
located within the Cathedral and City Centre Conservation
Area
- reported on observations made
by the City Council’s Conservation Officer as
follows:
- The building had historically
been two distinct properties, as suggested by the address, and by
the various dates of construction.
- No. 42, to the north, had
been a house and shop dating from the mid and late 18th
century. Constructed from brick with a stone plinth, at two storeys
plus garrets, it included a late C18 glazing bar shop window with
pilasters and cornice.
- No. 40, to the south, was a
domestic property and potentially dated from the 14th
century with 18th, 19th, and 20th
century alterations. The half-timbered structure sat on a dressed
stone and brick ground floor plinth. The gable framing had curved
braces and corner posts and the half-timber work was also expressed
internally.
- added that there was
currently access through a party wall that linked the two buildings
as a single unit and in recent years the property had been a
holiday let, managed by the National Trust, vacant since 2018; the
application proposed to reinstate the historic use of the building
as two distinct dwellings and it was intended to continue the
existing holiday let arrangement with the two dwellings
- gave further detail of the
proposed external and internal living arrangements for the building
as outlined within the officer’s report
- confirmed that internal and
external alterations were proposed to facilitate the subdivision of
the building, which also included repair and enhancement works;
whilst these works did not require the benefit of planning
permission, an
accompanying application (2021/0759/LBC) for listed building
consent would consider these with regard to the impact on the
building as a designated heritage asset
- highlighted that both
the full planning permission
and listed building consent applications were being presented to
Members of Planning Committee for determination due to the
application property being in thew ownership of the City
Council
- referred to the site history
to the application site as detailed further within the
officer’s report
- provided details of the
policies pertaining to the application, as follows:
- Policy LP25: The Historic
Environment
- Policy LP26: Design and
Amenity
- Policy LP33: Lincoln's City
Centre Primary Shopping Area and Central Mixed-Use Area
- National Planning Policy
Framework
- advised Planning Committee of
the main issues to be considered as part of the application to
assess the proposal with regards to:
- Policy Context and Principle
of Use
- Visual Amenity and Character
and Appearance of the Conservation Area
- Residential
Amenity
- Parking and
Highways
- confirmed that consultations
were carried out in accordance with the Statement of Community
Involvement, adopted January 2018
- highlighted at the time
of writing this report that the consultation period was still
underway and to date no statutory or public consultation responses
had been received relating to this full application; the
consultation period would have expired prior to the committee
meeting and any comments received would be provided within the
update sheet.
- noted, however, that the same
consultations had been undertaken for both the full and listed
building consent applications; therefore, the responses to the
listed building consent application that were relevant to this full
application were referenced within the associated report considered
next at tonight’s meeting
- referred to the Update Sheet
tabled at the meeting which included a response from
Lincolnshire County Council as Highways Authority stating that it
had no objections to the proposed development
- concluded that:
- The sub-division of the
property, re-instating its historic use, was welcomed and would
neither result in the area losing its mixed-use character nor would
it detract from the vitality or viability of the primary shopping
area.
- The external works associated
with the sub-division, although not requiring planning permission,
would be an improvement to the building and would enhance the
character and appearance of the conservation area.
- The application would not
cause undue harm to the amenities of neighbouring
properties.
- The application would
therefore be in accordance with the requirements of CLLP Policies
LP25, LP26 and LP33 and guidance within the NPPF.
The
Committee considered the content of the report in further
detail.
RESOLVED that planning
permission be granted subject to the conditions as set
out below.