Minutes:
Purpose of Report
To provide the Shared Revenues and Benefits Joint Committee with an update on current issues within non-domestic rates, related to City of Lincoln Council, North Kesteven District Council and West Lindsey District Council. The report was not intended to include non-domestic rate performance matters, as this was covered within the Performance Update reported to Joint Committee today.
Decision
That the content of the report be noted.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
None.
Reason for Decision
The report included some of the changes announced as a result of the Government’s financial support provided to businesses in the form of NDR relief, as well as forthcoming changes to the NDR system.
The following updates were noted:
NDR Changes and Significant Reliefs/Discounts
At the Autumn Statement on 30 October 2024, the Chancellor announced that the Government would continue to provide a package of NDR measures to support businesses in England.
Retail, Hospitality and Leisure Relief
Eligibility criteria for the Retail, Hospitality and Leisure Relief was set out by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), now called Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) and issued to Local Authorities on 20 December 2021. No changes were made to the qualifying criteria for the year 2024/25.
This relief had been extended for the year 2025/26 –whether there were any changes to the currently eligibility was pending the details being released by Government.
This was expected to end on 31 March 2026, with the introduction of the Retail, Hospitality and Leisure (RHL) multipliers.
The table at paragraph 4.5 of the officer’s report reflected the significant reduction in the amounts awarded in the last three years (previously known as the Expanded Retail Discount (ERD) scheme), with an estimate on the award to be granted in 2024/25.
Multipliers from 2026
The most significant announcement for NDR in the budget was the announcement of alternative multipliers for qualifying properties from 1 April 2026.
The full details of this were not yet known as this would require changes to the legislation and more information was expected to be released as the legislation was developed.
Like most current reliefs, the RHL was currently delivered using discretionary powers found in Section 47 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. In order to provide more certainty, the Government wanted to make the RHL a permanent feature of the NDR system and to level up NDR between online retailers and the High Street – the changes to the multipliers may go some way to doing this. Once this became part of the way the liability was calculated, it would no longer be a ‘discretionary relief’ under Section 47.
The five multipliers for 2026 were expected to be–
· Premium multiplier.
Any property with an Rateable Value in excess of £500,000 would have their rates calculated based on the premium multiplier, although properties in the RHL sector were expected to be based on either the Standard RHL or the Small business RHL. All other properties would therefore be calculated on either the standard or the small business multiplier as they were now.
Significant changes would need to be made to the current software in order for officers to be able to override the standard and small business multiplier in favour of the RHL where the activities at the property met the RHL eligibility.
Transforming NDR – Information taken from CIPFA
This paper was published by the Treasury as part of the Budget papers. The Government wanted to “create a fairer NDR system that protects the high street, supports investment, and is fit for the 21st century”.
The first step was the introduction of lower multipliers for retail, hospitality and leisure from 2026-27.
The paper invited business and other stakeholders to discuss how the government could deliver a transformed system.
The impact on the local government funding system would be considered in the review of NDR which the paper acknowledged was an important source of revenue for local government. The Government wanted to ensure that local government funding was not affected by these tax reforms.
The temporary RHL reliefs had meant uncertainty for businesses. The Government were looking to bring in more certainty by introducing a permanent reduction for retail properties with the introduction of the additional multipliers.
Other areas of reform included looking at the effectiveness of Improvement Relief, the loss of small business relief when taking on a second property, cliff edges in the system and empty property relief.
Supporting documents: