Minutes:
Amy Larder, Maintenance Manager:
Members discussed the content of the report, commented, asked questions and received relevant responses from Officers as follows:
Question: Who was responsible for repairs on enclosed porches? Was that the responsibility of the Council or the tenant?
Response: Some areas had been enclosed by a previous tenant that should not have been. They were not classed as a habitable space. The CoLC were responsible for canopies. Areas would be referred back and then maintained from there.
Question: Would it be more appropriate for the bleeding of radiators to be a Council responsibility rather than a tenant responsibility? If radiators were not bled correctly, it could result in the loss of heating and hot water.
Response: The Council would be responsible for a boiler issue that resulted in no heating.
Question: Could Officers provide some clarification around the provisions for textured ceilings and walls?
Response: Textured ceilings and walls in good condition would only be removed at the point where a repair was needed to them. If either were already in situ, it would not present a problem, however tenants were not to install any.
Comment: Should radiators come under the service per year to be checked and removed from the tenant’s responsibility. A tenant should report if a radiator was not producing heat effectively.
Response: There were DIY videos that would accompany the Repairs Policy in order to aid tenants with the tenant’s responsibilities.
Question: When were DIY videos planned to be rolled out?
Response: The videos were planned to accompany the Repairs Policy update on the website.
Comment: Referred to electrics within the home. Changing a fuse should be a Council responsibility only.
Response: Fuses were for individual appliances only. The Council would not expect a tenant to change a fuse on a fuse box.
Question: If there were a vulnerable tenant, disabled or elderly, and there was wear and tear on the toilet seat, would the Council replace it or would they help them to renew?
Response: There was a section for vulnerable tenants and this was where discretion would be exercised. Each case would be considered on an individual basis.
Question: Could Officers provide clarification on the 16 days difference between 12 weeks for schedule repairs and the 100 days stated?
Response: The figure of 100 days was included as a rounded figure. Repairs were scheduled within the twelve-week planning period. The 100-day target related to how IT systems were set up.
RESOLVED that Members agreed the contents of the report to progress to Executive for formal approval.
Supporting documents: