(Councillors Strengiel, Storer and Briggs left the room for the
remainder of the meeting having declared a personal and pecuniary
interest in the matter to be determined. They took no part in the
discussion or vote on the planning application)
The
Planning Team Leader:
- described the application for development on land in front of
Yarborough Leisure Centre, which proposed the erection of four 2/3
storey buildings fronting Riseholme Road to form townhouses with
five 3/4 storey buildings positioned behind
- advised that a previous application was refused by Planning
Committee on 26 February 2020 due to height and massing of the
proposed buildings
- advised that this application was granted planning permission by
Committee on 1 December 2021, subject to conditions as detailed
within the officer’s report included in tonight’s
agenda papers
- reported that the development would consist of 293 bedrooms of
accommodation for students with ancillary on site reception,
laundry facilities and warden accommodation
- added that a new vehicular access would be formed to Riseholme
Road and 17 parking spaces provided within the site for accessible
unloading and staff parking only
- highlighted that the land in question was allocated as a site
for residential development in the adopted Local Plan, currently
owned by the City of Lincoln Council with an agreement to sell to
the applicants
- described the location of the development site currently
grassland on the west side of Riseholme Road, with Lincoln Castle
Academy and Yarborough Leisure Centre situated to the north and
west, residential dwellings fronting Riseholme Road and Yarborough
Crescent to the south, the old caretaker’s bungalow in
private ownership to the north, and a strong line of trees which
formed the boundary with Riseholme Road to the east
- provided details of the policies pertaining to the application,
as follows:
- Policy LP1: A Presumption in Favour of Sustainable
Development
- Policy LP2: The Spatial Strategy and Settlement
Hierarchy
- Policy LP9: Health and Wellbeing
- Policy LP10: Meeting Accommodation Needs
- Policy LP12: Infrastructure to Support Growth
- Policy LP13: Accessibility and Transport
- Policy LP14: Managing Water Resources and Flood Risk
- Policy LP16: Development on Land affected by
Contamination
- Policy LP26: Design and Amenity
- Policy LP29: Protecting Lincoln's Setting and
Character
- Policy LP32: Lincoln's Universities and Colleges
- National Planning Policy Framework
- advised Planning Committee of the main issues considered as part
of the application to assess the proposal with regards
to:
- Principle of Use
- Visual Amenity
- Impact on Residential amenity
- Traffic and Pedestrian Safety
- Drainage/SUDs
- Trees and Landscaping
- Archaeology
- Contaminated Land
- outlined the responses made to the consultation
exercise
- concluded that:
- The
previous refusal reason relating to height and massing of the
buildings had been overcome by the revised application.
- The
development would relate well to the site and surroundings,
particularly in relation to siting, height, scale, massing, and
design.
- The
proposal allowed Bishop Grosseteste University to continue to
develop and ensured that there was little impact on their
neighbours and the wider City.
- Technical matters relating to highways, contamination,
archaeology, and drainage were to the satisfaction of the relevant
consultees and could be further controlled as necessary by
conditions.
- The
proposals would therefore be in accordance with the requirements of
CLLP Policies and the NPPF.
- emphasised again
that this planning application was already approved by Planning
Committee on 1 December 2021, subject to conditions which included
the provision of increased public transport services
(bus service), at the responsibility of the developer, from
Mondays-Saturdays, continuing for 3 years post final completion of
the development, prior to occupation of the student
accommodation
- highlighted that this condition was proposed by Lincolnshire
County Council as Highways Authority at the time to increase an
existing bus service operating on a Friday/Saturday
evening
- advised that the above condition had been found to be unworkable
as the previous bus service on Fri /Sat evenings no longer existed,
the bus operator would have to buy new buses, the cost for which
was disproportionate to the development proposals and not
justifiable or financially viable for the bus company in the
current economic climate
- requested authorisation for removal of the above condition from
the previously granted planning permission in order that the
development could proceed moving forward.
The Committee considered the
content of the report in further detail.
Councillor Hewson recognised the
problems highlighted with the increased
public transport condition imposed on the original
grant of planning permission for this site and why it could not be
met. He was happy for the development to go ahead without this
additional condition.
Councillor Bean referred to
existing problems with sustained bus services in the current
economic climate and the fact that the condition was open to fail
as the bus service was required to operate for three
years
Councillor Watt advised that the condition had been considered
as important at the time planning permission was granted and should
be part of the development. He asked whether the planning
application could be refused on the basis that the condition could
not be met.
The
Chair advised of the remit of Planning Committee this evening to
approve or refuse the planning application before us this evening
without the additional transport condition.
RESOLVED that planning permission be granted as previously
granted on 1 December 2021, however with the
condition imposed regarding the provision of increased public
transport services (bus service) at the responsibility of the
developer removed. Also subject to the signing of an S106 agreement
securing a contribution to additional NHS services in the vicinity
and subject to the conditions as set out below.
Conditions
·
Development to commence within three
years
·
Hedge and tree protection to be in place at all
times during construction
·
Materials
·
Highway conditions
·
Archaeology
·
Remediation shall be implemented in accordance with
submitted remediation strategy
·
Submission of construction management
plan
·
Retention of parking spaces at all times
·
Development to proceed in accordance with submitted
Travel Plan
·
Landscaping to be in implemented in accordance with
the submitted landscaping plan
·
Enhanced landscaping condition to pursue
biodiversity