Agenda item

Allotment Fees and Charges

This item is scheduled for consideration at the meeting of the Executive on 18 January 2021, which is subsequent to the publication date of this agenda. A copy of the report to the Executive is therefore included as part of the agenda pack for this meeting.

Minutes:

Councillor Ralph Toofany left the meeting during consideration of this item further to his declaration of a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest.

 

Councillor Ric Metcalfe proposed the recommendations set out in the report, which was seconded by Councillor Donald Nannestad.

 

Councillor Thomas Dyer, reflecting on the current circumstances, said that vulnerable people in particular had been dependant on their own entertainment, with allotments being a key aspect of that for many people in the city. He therefore questioned the timing of a proposed increase, but welcomed the fact that a years’ notice would be provided to allotment holders. He asked whether the Council could look into the possibility of introducing a concession for old age pensioners.

 

Councillor Bob Bushell reminded Council that the allotment service was very heavily subsidised even taking into account the proposed increase in fees and charges. He recognised the importance of allotments which was why the Council had recently invested approximately £1 million to improve security, access to water and the introduction of a new site. Councillor Bushell was content with a concession being offered on a means tested benefit system as opposed to age and made the point that income generated by allotment fees and charges would be reinvested into the allotment service. He was also confident, even taking into account an increase in fees and charges, that users of the service would continue to consider it as good value.

 

Councillor Christopher Reid was concerned that elderly users of the service who would not qualify for a concession rate under the means tested benefit system would see their current concession removed as well as having to pay an increased fee. He would therefore wish to see a concession for old aged pensioners.

 

Councillor Ric Metcalfe reiterated that the Council understood the value of allotments, particularly at times such as those the country was facing in the current circumstances, which was why such a significant capital investment was made in the service. He reported, however, that the Council’s finances were in a very serious state and contributions from the majority of the authority’s budgets was required in order to address this. In reviewing this against the allotment service, given the recent investment and importance of the service, it did not seem appropriate to cut the service. A better approach was therefore proposed whereby service users paid a bit more for the service in order that full provision in the city could be maintained. Councillor Metcalfe reported that, even with the increase in fees and charges, the cost of the service was still £67,000 per year. He added that low income groups would be protected but was of the opinion that age alone should not act as a proxy for low income.

 

Having been proposed and seconded and being put to the vote it was RESOLVED that changes to the fees and charges for allotments be approved, with effect from the annual billing in 2022 and new leases thereafter, and that these be based on:

 

·                     removal of the 50% discount based on age;

·                     protection of discounts for those on means tested benefits at             50%;

·                     an increase in based charges by 50%;

·                     any income achieved above £30,000, linked with inflation, be            ringfenced for allotment projects.

Supporting documents: