Agenda and minutes

·         16 January 2018

·         20 February 2018

RESOLVED that the minutes from the meetings held on 16th January 2018 and 20 February 2018 be confirmed.

Councillor Andrew Kerry declared a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest with regard to the agenda item titled 'Health Scrutiny Update'.

Reason: He worked for the East Midlands Ambulance Service. He left the room during the consideration of this item.

Graham Rose, Senior Policy Officer

a.    presented a report to provide an update on the progress with implementation plans for the Lincoln Community Lottery (LCL) and to provide the proposed criteria for the acceptance of good causes.

b.    advised that Gatherwell had been appointed as External Lottery Manager on a two year contract.

c.    referred to paragraph 3 of the report and gave an overview of the actions that had been completed and the next steps in the process.

d.    outlined the mechanics of how the lottery would work and advised that for every £1 spent, the purchaser could allocate 50% towards their chosen good cause and a further 10% would go into a central pot for the City of Lincoln Council to allocate, if the purchaser did not choose a good cause the central pot would get the full 60%.

e.    suggested other criteria for allowing a ‘good cause’ to join the lottery as detailed at Appendix A of the report.

f.     referred to Appendices B and C of the report which set out 3 boundary areas for consideration and advised that it was recommended that a 6 mile boundary be adopted.

g.    proposed that a panel of at least 2 members plus officers be formed to agree the good causes accepted onto the lottery and suggested that they also considered the appropriate distribution of funds from the central pot on a quarterly basis.

h.    referred to appendices D to L and advised that Gatherwell had provided 5 policies, 1 draft GDPR policy and 3 terms to cover all aspects of implementation.

i.      invited members’ questions and comments.

Question: Would a national charity be eligible if they had a local branch but their funds were kept in a central pot of money not local to Lincoln?

Response: If the charity had a local branch and they could guarantee that the money was spent locally, then they would meet the eligibility criteria, and this would be included in the terms of reference of the members’ panel.

Question: What would the Community Fund be spent on?

Response: Members could recommend how the funds from the central pot could be distributed, there were no specific causes identified at the moment.

Question: If 50% of the £1 spent would go to the chosen good cause and 10% go to the central pot, what would the remaining 40% be used for?

Response: It would be used to run the lottery, it would go towards prizes, VAT which could be claimed back and used to cover operating costs and to Gatherwell for running the lottery on behalf of the Council.

Question: Would there be any extra staffing costs?

Response: No there would be no additional staffing costs. 

Question: How would players of the lottery purchase tickets?

Response: Gatherwell would run the lottery on behalf of the council and would take all payments either online or over the telephone.

Question: How much take up was expected?

Response: Based on comparisons of other lotteries that had been  ...  view the full minutes text for item 46.

Simon Colburn, Assistant Director, Health and Environmental Services:

a.    presented the Private Housing Health Assistance Policy 2018-2022 for consultation and advised that it would supersede the Private Sector Housing Assistance Policy which had been suspended by Executive in 2015.

b.    referred to paragraph 5.2 of the Private Housing Health Assistance Policy 2018 - 2022 and gave an overview of the challenges that had been highlighted by the recent BRE Integrated Dwelling Level Housing Stock Modelling and Database for the City of Lincoln Council.

c.    referred to paragraph 2.2 of the report and advised on the changes that the Government had made to the funding mechanism for Disabled Facilities Grants.

d.    summarised the aim of the fund which was to provide a more joined up and customer based service to reduce hospital and care admissions and enable people to return home from hospital more quickly.

e.    advised on the aims of the proposed Private Housing Health Assistance policy as detailed at paragraph 4.2 of the report.

f.     referred to Appendix 1 of the report and gave an overview of the proposed schemes. 

g.    advised that it was proposed that the formal means testing element be removed from the majority of the Discretionary Schemes which would reduce the time taken to process applications and assist in early intervention to prevent hospital admission/reduce reliance on carers.

h.    referred to paragraph 4.42 of the report and highlighted the proposed introduction of several new forms of financial assistance which could be used to support wider social care outcomes.

i.      advised that consultation on the draft policy had taken place with Lincolnshire County Council Adult Care and Community Wellbeing.

j.      advised on the financial and legal implications to the council as detailed at paragraph 6 of the report.

k.    gave an overview of the options that had been explored and the key risks associated with the preferred approach as detailed at paragraph 7 of the report.

l.      invited members’ questions and comments.

Question: Would the grants be advertised?

Response: The mandatory Disabled Facilities Grants (DFG's) were not advertised, however, some of the other grants would need to be promoted to make people aware of them.

Question: Would the changes to the welfare system affect the Disabled Facilities Grants and could there be changes made to the grants?

Response: There were no proposals from the Government at the moment to make any changes to the DFG's.

Question: Was there a cash limit on the DFG's?

Response: There was a fixed budget allocated from the County Council to the District Councils at the beginning of each financial year. Currently the district allocation was approximately £700,000.

Comment: Concern was expressed over the staffing levels and the need for the council to ensure that the staff could cope with the extra work that this would bring.

Response: It was difficult to recruit staff in higher level housing positions nationally. There had been a review of the structure within the team, which involved members of staff being upskilled. It was felt  ...  view the full minutes text for item 47.

Hannah Cann, Private Housing Team Leader

a.    presented the new Empty Homes Strategy for Lincoln 2017-2022 to deliver the Vision 2020 and Housing Strategy objectives.

b.    advised that as of 1^st January 2018 there were 419 long term empty privately owned homes in the City, 104 of these properties had been empty for two or more years.

c.    advised that bringing empty homes back to use offered income opportunities to the council, both through receipt of New Homes Bonus, and the potential to acquire and develop properties for resale or letting.

d.    referred to paragraph 4.2 of the report and highlighted the 4 main aims of the Empty Homes Strategy.

e.    referred to Appendix 5 of the strategy which set out the terms and conditions of the Empty Homes Working Group and advised that the group would identify long term empty homes, in particular those causing a problem, and bring them back to use.

f.     advised that there were resource needs including a capital budget for the acquisition and renovation of empty homes which would be identified on a case by case basis.

g.    referred to the action plan at Appendix 1 of the report and advised that the actions centred around exploring and improving the options available to the Council, on its own or in partnership to encourage and enforce owners to bring their homes back into use, and to acquire, develop and manage or dispose of long term empty homes.

h.    referred to paragraph 6.2 of the report and explained the enforcement powers that would be used to improve the condition of the empty homes and bring them back into use.

i.      invited members’ questions and comments.

Question: Had the Council tried to bring empty properties above shops back into use?

Response: Yes where it was viable, there were often fire safety issues for properties above shops as it was shared access.

Question: In cases where a property had been left empty due to someone going to prison would the Council liaise with the Victim Liaison Service before taking enforcement action?

Response: Yes, the process initially would be to engage with the owner and the approach would be adapted depending on the reasons why the property had been left empty.

Question: With reference to The Empty Dwelling Management Order (EDMO) where the Council would take control of the property for up to seven years, what would happen to the property after 7 years?

Response: The property would be let to someone on the housing waiting list with an immediate housing need, it would be made clear to them when they moved in that it would not be a house for life. Part of the action plan at Appendix 1 of the policy was to write operational procedures for EDMOs.

Comment: It was suggested that the membership of the Empty Property Working Group be referenced earlier in the Policy.

Response: Paragraph 4.3 of the policy could be amended to include a list of areas involved in the Empty  ...  view the full minutes text for item 48.

Becky Scott, Legal and Democratic Services Manager:

a.    presented the EU General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Policy for consideration prior to Executive approval.

b.    advised that the Data Protection Act 1988 would be replaced by a new Data Protection Act 2018 which would implement the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) into UK law by 25 May 2018.

c.    advised that the Council needed to have a policy to enable the council to be compliant with the new legal framework and also to raise awareness of the GDPR to officers’ and Councillors. Therefore members of the public could be confident that the organisation was aware of their responsibilities of the new legal framework.

d.    advised that the GDPR stated that anyone processing personal data must adhere to the 6 date principles.

e.    gave an overview of the following 6 data protection principles:

1.    Lawfulness, fairness and transparency principle: processed fairly, lawfully and in a transparent manner in relation to individuals.

2.    Purpose limitation principle: collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purpose and not further processed in a manner incompatible with those processes.

3.    Data minimisation principle: adequate, relevant and limited to what was necessary for the purposes for which they are processed.

4.    Accuracy principle: accurate and where necessary kept up to date.

5.    Storage limitation principle: kept in a form which permits identification of the date subjects for no longer than necessary for the purposes for which the personal data was processed.

6.    Integrity and confidentially principle: processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data, including protection against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss, destruction or damage, using appropriate technical or organisational measures.

f.     advised that an Equality Impact Assessment was not required.

Members considered the contents of the report.

RESOLVED that the General Data Protection Regulation (Data Protection) Policy be supported and referred to Executive for approval.

The Democratic Services Officer:

1. presented the report 'Draft policy Scrutiny Work Programme 2018-2019 and Executive Work Programme'
2. presented the Executive Work Programme March 2018 to February 2019.
3. requested councillors to submit what items they wished to scrutinise from the Executive Work Programme and policies of interest.
4. invited member’s questions and comments.

Members made no further comments or suggestions regarding the Policy Scrutiny work programme.

RESOLVED that:

1.    The Policy Scrutiny work programme be noted.

2.    The Executive work programme be noted.

The Chair of Policy Scrutiny Committee updated members of the business that had been discussed at the Health Scrutiny meeting held on 21 February 2018:

• Alternative Provisions to the Walk in Centre
• Non- Emergency Patient Transport Services for NHS Lincolnshire CCG's
• Lincolnshire Sustainability and Transformation Partnership: Mental Health Priority
• Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy.

RESOLVED that the content of the verbal report be noted.