Venue: Committee Rooms 1 and 2, City Hall, Beaumont Fee, Lincoln, LN1 1DD
Contact: Ali Hewson, Democratic Services Officer (01522 873370)
No. | Item |
---|---|
Confirmation of Minutes: 31 January 2024 Minutes: RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 31 January 2024 be confirmed and signed by the Chair as a correct record. |
|
Confirmation of Minutes: 21 February 2024 Minutes: RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 21 February 2024 be confirmed and signed by the Chair as a correct record. |
|
Minutes: An update sheet was circulated in relation to planning applications to be considered this evening, which included additional information for Members attention received after the original agenda documents had been published.
RESOLVED that the update sheet be received by Planning Committee. |
|
Declarations of Interest Please note that, in accordance with the Members' Code of Conduct, when declaring interests members must disclose the existence and nature of the interest, and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI) or personal and/or pecuniary. Minutes: No declarations of interest were received. |
|
Confirmation of Tree Preservation Order 181 Additional documents: Minutes: The Planning Team Leader:
RESOLVED that Tree Preservation Order No 181 be confirmed without modification and that delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Director of Planning to carry out the requisite procedures for confirmation. |
|
Application for Development - 1 Shearwater Road, Lincoln Additional documents:
Minutes: The Planning Team Leader:
a. referred to the application site at 1 Shearwater Road, Lincoln, a detached house located on the corner of Skellingthorpe Road and Shearwater Road
b. reported that the property was accessed from Shearwater Road although the application proposed an additional access from Skellingthorpe Road and associated works including a dropped kerb, remodelling of the existing boundary wall and gates to create an opening
c. added that the application also proposed an outbuilding within the rear garden adjacent to the boundary with No.5 Shearwater Close and the rear boundary of the application property
d. advised that a previous application had been refused because of the outbuildings position close to a protected tree within the garden, the resubmission proposed a repositioning of the access and the outbuilding
e. provided details of the policies pertaining to the application, as follows:
· Impact on Residential Amenity · Impact on Protected Trees · Highway Safety
g. outlined the responses made to the consultation exercise
h. confirmed that the material considerations for this application were the impacts of the dropped kerb and erection of the outbuilding only; comments regarding the main use of the property, the need for the proposals or motives of the applicant were not relevant and should not be given any weight in the planning balance
· The scale and design of the proposed outbuilding was acceptable and the design would sympathetically complement the local architectural style. · The proposals would not cause undue harm to the amenities which occupiers of neighbouring properties may reasonably expect to enjoy. · Matters in relation to highways and impact on trees had been appropriately considered. · The application would therefore be in accordance with the requirements of Central Lincolnshire Local Plan Policies S47, S53, and S66 and guidance within the National Planning Policy Framework.
Mr John Williams, local resident addressed Planning Committee in objection to the planning application, covering the following main points:
· He thanked members of Planning Committee for giving him the opportunity to speak. · He represented all those people having submitted objections. · The issues raised here were concerns in relation to environmental impact, danger to life, safety issues and disturbance to local residents. · The applicant already had an existing dropped kerb and rear access to the site and his property. · If the outbuilding was to be used for storage, then why was vehicular access to it required. · Was it to be used as a self -contained dwelling in the future. · In relation to Policy S66, irreversible damage to the trees had already been caused and mechanical diggers used to take the roots away. · Boundaries for the tree protection plan shown on page 70 of the agenda pack had been exceeded. ... view the full minutes text for item 72. |