Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 18 June 2018 be confirmed.

Please note that, in accordance with the Members' Code of Conduct, when declaring interests members must disclose the existence and nature of the interest, and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI) or personal and/or pecuniary.

No declarations of interest were received.

To provide a report on the findings of the Western Growth Corridor Draft Masterplan public consultation, consider draft responses and seek agreement to vary the masterplan as a result.

Decision

(1)       That the proposed responses to the comments received from the consultation on the draft Western Growth Corridor Masterplan, as set out in Appendix 1 of the report, be agreed.

(2)       That the responses be published on the Council’s website and sent to the individual respondents who have asked for feedback.       

(3)       That the Masterplan be amended to show the access from Hartsholme Drive into the development as a cycle/pedestrian link only.

None.

Public consultation on the Draft Masterplan for the Western Growth Corridor was undertaken between 28 June 2017 and 15 November 2018, resulting in 298 responses containing 982 comments covering 41 different topics. The consultation involved a series of open-ended questions and an open comment section to ensure that respondents’ views were not restricted or confined. Nine events, including one organised by the local community, were held in and around the area, supported with comment forms and promoted through a range of media as set out in paragraph 4.2 of the report.

Areas of the highest concern were reported as relating to traffic, flooding, Hartsholme Drive access and connection to the development and infrastructure. A comprehensive analysis of the comments received as part of the consultation had been undertaken, with proposed responses to the common themes set out in Appendix 1 of the report.

It was proposed that the Masterplan be amended to show the access from Hartsholme Drive into the development as a cycle/pedestrian link only, with concerns raised to this effect as part of the consultation process.

In terms of traffic and congestion, it had been agreed that further modelling works would be undertaken to ascertain the wider impacts of the proposed development including the impact on some junctions. It was acknowledged that traffic and congestion was a key issue, with lots of work taking place to ensure that the best possible solution could be put in place.

Very detailed modelling via the Environment Agency and Internal Drainage Board had been undertaken. This had shown that with a reduced level of housing on the proposed reduced area of development all properties that would remain dry in the event of flooding from a breach in existing flood defences would still remain dry with the full proposed development in place. In addition, there were a range of works that would be undertaken which provided a wider benefit and reduced the risk of some types of flooding to areas currently at risk in this part of the city.

Discussion ensued on the need for a greater level of public transport services after 6pm, particularly in respect of the north of the city. It was agreed that the Transport Hub had been a key project in terms of providing an environment where better and safer public transport provision could  ...  view the full minutes text for item 21.